In the spring of 2009, during the run-up to the launch of his meaningful use program, President Obama spoke at a health summit in which he touted the electronic health record as a financial panacea.

National adoption would safeguard against medical errors, improve preventive care and save $80 billion annually, he said, citing a widely quoted RAND Corp. analysis from 2005. For many in the industry, however, the claims of widespread savings from EHR deployments are overblown. It's an exaggeration rooted in the paucity of meaningful studies, the bias of I.T. proponents and the vested interest of software companies.

Ironically, many experts say introduction of EHRs will, in the short-term at least, actually raise the national outlay for care. But even skeptics who debunk the EHR's potential as a fiscal brake on health care inflation still uphold the urgent need for widespread adoption of the technology.

The Cover Story in the June issue of Health Data Management explores the debate around the financial impact of EHRs.


Register or login for access to this item and much more

All Health Data Management content is archived after seven days.

Community members receive:
  • All recent and archived articles
  • Conference offers and updates
  • A full menu of enewsletter options
  • Web seminars, white papers, ebooks

Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access