7 tips to improve patient identity processes

With provider organizations merging and creating affiliations with other providers as accountable care organizations expand, accurate matching of patients to a unique medical record is crucial; yet, it’s challenging as patients receive care at various points within a highly complex healthcare system. Critical and potentially fatal errors can be made when a patient or the surgical area of a patient is incorrectly identified.

7 tips to improve patient identity processes
A new report from health information management consultancy Just Associates examines the patient-matching landscape and identifies seven critical issues providers need to get right.
1. HDM 0810 240_F_106044912_VYrdqYSCYafieWjbdqkk2htDLScdSEjn.jpg
1. Capture data
Data capture plays a tremendous role in the creation of duplicate patient information. Front-end registration processes and optimizing algorithms on the back-end are equally important. If data is not captured accurately, according to policy and complete in all required fields, the patient’s incorrect health information is initially fractured and subsequently cascades throughout multiple downstream health information systems.
2. HDM0810 240_F_84981902_GcuWgwAtFq1Xp9vVqyS6al12Wb7DFHfM.jpg
2. Standardize data
Standardizing data capture by increasing the number of primary data values and incorporating secondary data values will support sharing accurate patient information across electronic health records to downstream systems and to multiple data partners, such as insurance payers or health information exchange organizations.
3. HDM0810 240_F_95808278_83bX8KZls05wRBMEEqEKvgV5MrFdUCKT.jpg
3. Trusted data
Data analytics and informatics rely on trusted data that is complete and reliable, no matter the source of truth. When there are significant amounts of duplicate and overlaid records, the value of analytics is significantly diminished.
4. HDM0810 240_F_27275627_LhguBS20drjcz07wFo4UfY70WENsWSDi.jpg
4. Biometrics beckon
Biometrics, such as iris recognition and palm vein scanning techniques, hold great promise in minimizing the creation of new duplicates. Implementation considerations should address historical records or multiple duplicates that already exist within a health system, as these would not likely contain biometric images until many years down the road. The real value of the new technology will be realized once critical mass has been achieved.
5. HDM0810 240_F_78682177_IObJGGSGUjt8qyahqqc5MUsxNAOr82VG.jpg
5. Algorithm challenges
Advanced record matching algorithms are an important piece to the overall patient-matching solution, but they are not the “silver bullet.” Most provider organizations do not have access to such algorithms. Further, the “black box” in these products works differently across various vendors and have varying degrees of record-match accuracy and error tolerance. In addition, the effectiveness of these advanced algorithms is at the mercy of the quality and completeness of the patient identity data attributes captured.
6. HDM0810 240_F_60461808_67SOMtoT5PuiTA0RHPsPEclN1yEQnzFk.jpg
6. Police your policies
Policies are critical, but they must be reviewed and upheld. Some healthcare organizations have excellent policies regarding patient medical record number creation processes. However, unless they are monitored for compliance and updated as needed, they may become outdated and disregarded.
7. HDM0810 240_F_84448950_3WDZyAPRblxXmcZ8GZWO268V68EQTLhN.jpg
7. Data integrity team
Training is essential to patient matching “baseline” practices. The data integrity team must be updated on current tools and expectations, including topics like feedback protocols for the patient registration/access team.
8. HDM0810 240_F_91838866_b3XzlF53u9yEmIdxHB2NAYfn8HLF9Ttb.jpg
For additional information on this topic
The full report is available here.