There hasn’t been this much excitement over court proceedings since the O.J. Simpson trial and those hanging chads in Florida, and now like then there’s going to be celebrations and exasperation when the health reform decision is announced. But even if the Supreme Court hits all the right notes in the eyes of payers and providers and allows the foundations of the bill to remain, the potential for real reform going forward is limited, and much of those limitations center around online state insurance exchanges and their myriad definitions of “essential” benefits.
While HHS has established a national set of minimum essential benefits for insurance packages offered by the states, it’s also left the door open for mischief by giving meaning to the most dangerous phrase known to man … “regulatory flexibility.”
Register or login for access to this item and much more
All Health Data Management content is archived after seven days.
Community members receive:
- All recent and archived articles
- Conference offers and updates
- A full menu of enewsletter options
- Web seminars, white papers, ebooks
Already have an account? Log In
Don't have an account? Register for Free Unlimited Access