JUN 26, 2009 3:55pm ET

Related Links

Survey: Docs Love Mobile Devices, I.T. Departments Don’t
February 3, 2012
Canadian Telecom Firm Buys EHR Firm
February 3, 2012
AMA to Sebelius: Stop ICD-10
February 2, 2012
Physician Software Vendor Greenway Medical Goes Public
February 2, 2012
Study: E-Scripts Improve Medication Adherence
February 1, 2012
HIT Vendor Round-up: Castlight, MedAssets & Aprima
January 31, 2012
Laptop Loaded with PHI Stolen from Lexington Clinic
January 31, 2012

AMDIS: Delay CPOE as "Meaningful Use"

Print
Reprints
Email

When the meaningful use workgroup of the HIT Policy Committee on June 16 released its initial draft look at a definition, the first objective listed for possible criteria in 2011 was the use of computerized physician order entry for all order types including medications.

That's too tall an order too quickly, and should be deferred to 2013 or beyond, says the Association of Medical Directors of Information Systems in a comment letter to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology.

"Implementing full CPOE is an important but complicated undertaking fraught with potential unintended negative consequences if done too quickly or incorrectly," according to the letter. "Even in the hands of our most experienced members working in organizations with EHR systems that are already up and running, successfully implementing robust CPOE functionality is generally a challenging, multi-year undertaking that requires careful planning and execution."

"Ambulatory e-prescribing is a notable CPOE exception that we are comfortable recommending for 2011 because it is a mature enough technology to be reasonably considered 'ready for prime time' and will have a sufficiently impactful effect on quality and cost to be worth striving for," the Lake Almanor, Calif.-based association added. Other recommendations include:

* Meaningful use "as seen through the patient's eyes" should specifically inform objectives and measures.

* Clarification is needed for payment under the stimulus law for meaningful use. It is unclear whether payment will require meeting some or all of the objectives, measures, or both.

* Keep 2011 objectives and measures sharply focused on demonstrated evidence of appropriate EHR data capture and sharing.

* Defer reporting of quality measures until 2013 when appropriate data capture and sharing should be in widespread use.

* Permit meaningful use incentives based on organizations demonstrating they meet expectations for sending and receiving data, regardless of whether trading partners can do so.

Full text of the AMDIS comment letter is available at meaningfuluse.org/Portals/0/AMDIS Response.pdf.

--Joseph Goedert

EHR

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

A major success factor for accountable care organizations will be linking caregivers across the spectrum of care delivery. If history is any indication, that's going to be an industrywide struggle.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.