NOV 5, 2012 11:25am ET

Related Links

Intermountain Tracking Patients’ Cumulative Radiation Exposure
May 24, 2013
Breach Pattern: Thieves Seek X-rays for their Silver Content
May 14, 2013
Vendor Scam Results in Data Breach for Clinic
May 9, 2013
Joint Commission Issues Alert on Medical Device Alarm Fatigue
April 8, 2013
President Obama’s Challenge: Map the Brain
April 2, 2013
Congressional Opposition to Medical Device Tax Grows
March 22, 2013
Part II: New Products Vendors are Demoing at HIMSS13
March 1, 2013

Changes Reverberate Through Medical Imaging Industry

Print
Reprints
Email

When Bibb Allen, M.D., surveys the imaging landscape, he sees a pockmarked fiscal terrain. Currently serving as vice chair of the American College of Radiology's Board of Chancellors, the 21-year industry veteran says a combination of factors is putting unprecedented economic pressure on imaging.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has been cutting reimbursement for radiology services since the Deficit Reduction Act in 2006, he says, with reimbursements for some studies declining by 50 percent since the act and six subsequent CMS cuts.

Add to that declining volume-the Medical Imaging and Technology Alliance estimates that studies were down 3 percent in 2010 among Medicare recipients, and a utilization study by the Health Care Cost Institute found a 5.6 percent decrease in radiology services utilization for private insurers in 2010.

Those declines are in part due to the recession, in part to the rise of non-invasive surgical procedures which no longer require as much imaging, Allen says. Regardless of the cause, you have the elements of fiscal uncertainty. "There is full employment in radiology," he acknowledges. "The American College of Radiology data show the same number of people retiring as graduating. But the idea of getting five job offers in your hometown after residency is not happening anymore. Radiologists cannot be picky about where they work." Not only that, Allen says that in the rapidly emerging quality and outcomes-conscious era of accountable care, radiologists will have to assume a new role-one wrapped around assuring appropriate utilization, rather than just churning out reports at the behest of referring physicians.

The changes are reverberating throughout the imaging industry, experts say. Many radiologists say they feel like they're in the crosshairs of payers, which often see imaging as an expensive line item that's prone to over-utilization. In addition, the rise of accountable care organizations also puts radiologists in a tenuous financial position as they struggle to gain at a voice at the table when it comes to administering new ACO reimbursement models such as bundled payments.

Radiology is an I.T.-rich environment. Digital imaging has all but replaced film, and picture archiving and communications systems have become the norm and have streamlined image gathering and report writing. But the next big I.T. wave hitting radiology will incorporate more decision support tools, data analytics and perhaps even personal imaging records as the industry transitions away from fee-for-service to outcomes-based pay.

“Tight Squeeze,” Gary Baldwin’s feature story in the November issue of Health Data Management, explores the challenges in a new era for medical imaging.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

As the feds ramp up enforcement of privacy and security rules, providers look to fill protection gaps.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.