DEC 15, 2009 5:12pm ET

Related Links

Mostashari’s Journey Comes to the 'Next Big Step' of Health I.T.
February 23, 2012
Multimedia Madness - The Unresolved Challenge for Records Management
February 17, 2012
Survey: Patients Like EHRs, but Wish Security Was Better
February 16, 2012
eHealth Initiative Studies the I.T. of ACOs
February 10, 2012
CSC Report Looks Ahead to Stage 2 Meaningful Use
February 7, 2012
Survey: Shifts May be Coming in CMIO Demographics
February 6, 2012
Survey: Docs Love Mobile Devices, I.T. Departments Don’t
February 3, 2012

HHS Advised on Measuring Quality

Print
Reprints
Email

The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics, an advisory body to the Department of Health and Human Services, has made several recommendations to facilitate meaningful measurement of care quality using electronic health records.

A core purpose of the HITECH Act is to accelerate adoption and meaningful use of EHRs to measure and improve health care processes and outcomes, NCVHS noted in a recent letter to HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. "In order to effectively produce comparative quality data, EHRs must be designed with quality reporting requirements in mind. For example, EHRs must be designed to capture relevant clinical data using standardized data definitions and standardized quality measure definitions. To receive HITECH incentive payments, providers will need to collect specific data to build quality of care reports."

The committee's recommendations include:

* HHS should develop a national quality and performance measurement strategy and establish an oversight structure to coordinate existing initiatives in the national strategy.

* HHS should fund creation of a library of specifications for quality and performance measures and their associated essential EHR data elements. These elements would be the building blocks for quality measures and risk adjustors.

* The Office of the National Coordinator should require as part of EHR system certification that vendors use relevant standard data element definitions from the quality and performance data specification library when producing data in compliance with the meaningful use criteria. EHRs should employ data exchange methods to support the computation of quality measures, whether computation is internal or external. To ensure patient trust, these exchange methods should be structured to protect data security, privacy and confidentiality. EHRs, as part of continued certification, also should have the capability of incorporating new standardized data elements in a timely manner as they are identified.

The complete letter is available at ncvhs.hhs.gov/091201lt.pdf.

--Joseph Goedert

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

Looking to build better care coordination, health systems are buying physician groups in droves. Making the deal work, however, requires careful management on the I.T. front.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.