APR 30, 2012 12:19pm ET

Related Links

AHA to Senators: EHR Concerns Understandable, but Don’t Pause Meaningful Use
May 20, 2013
Coalition to Senate: Time to ‘Re-do’ Meaningful Use
May 20, 2013
Rule Sets Pre-existing Coverage Rates
May 20, 2013
KLAS Ranks I.T. Outsource Companies
May 17, 2013
Quick Turnaround on Breach Notification
May 17, 2013
Tableau Sold as “DATA” in Stock Market Debut
May 17, 2013
California Developing Guidance for Patient Consent of HIE
May 17, 2013

Survey: Docs Not Impressed with ACOs

Print
Reprints
Email

A survey of 24,000 physicians finds widespread skepticism about accountable care organizations and certain other components of health care reform.

The reform questions were among multiple topics covered in the annual Physician Compensation Report from WebMD’s Medscape professional Web site for physicians. In addition to salary trends, the survey also covered such issues as time spent with patients vs. doing administrative tasks, and career satisfaction rates. Among reform issues:

* Fifty-two percent of responding physicians believe ACOs will result in a decline in income. Twelve percent say ACOs will have little or no effect;

* Only 3 percent of participants currently participate in an ACO;

* Physicians are not impressed with reform’s goal of reducing “unnecessary care,” with two-thirds saying they won’t reduce the number of tests, procedures and treatments they perform because insurer treatment guidelines are not in the best interest of patients or they continue to feel the need to practice defensive medicine;

* Many physicians believe guidelines are instituted to reduce costs rather than put patients first; and

* Forty-six percent of respondents discuss costs of treatment if the patient raises the issue, 38 percent regularly discuss costs and 16 percent never discuss costs because they think it’s inappropriate or don’t know themselves what the costs are.

The report is available at medscape.com.

Comments (3)
There are no surprises in this revelation. The ACO is a made-up, convoluted, mixed bag, of jumble with no clear focus - other than make health care cheaper to deliver. It is costly (systems, new reports, and extensive staff training) and has no basis of showing hard dollar savings, or hard data analytics on improved clinical outcomes - OR WHAT THE PATIENTS ACTUALLY BENEFIT. Much ado about nothing! However - it is a nice generator of fees for attorneys and consultants.
Posted by Dennis G | Monday, April 30 2012 at 3:07PM ET
Of course doctors are not happy with it. It will take them a while to overcome the pharma training they have had but I'm convinced less healthcare is more.
Posted by Sharon H | Monday, April 30 2012 at 5:35PM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

As the feds ramp up enforcement of privacy and security rules, providers look to fill protection gaps.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.