MAR 11, 2010 12:07pm ET

Related Links

Federal Grants Help HIEs Link Mental Health and Medical Providers
February 10, 2012
The State of Cloud Standards
February 10, 2012
eHealth Initiative Studies the I.T. of ACOs
February 10, 2012
Health I.T. Vendor Round-up: TigerText, MRO, meridianEMR, Anthelio
February 8, 2012
Health I.T. Vendor Round-up: Greenway, SOAPware, eCareSoft, gloStream
February 8, 2012
Report: HIEs Need I.T. Help, but Shun HIT Workers from Fed’s Training Programs
February 8, 2012
CSC Report Looks Ahead to Stage 2 Meaningful Use
February 7, 2012

Senate Supports MU Eligibility Change

Print
Reprints
Email

U.S. Senate-passed legislation that extends programs and tax incentives that create jobs includes language to expand the types of physicians eligible for meaningful use incentive payments under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. The Senate on March 10 in a 62-36 vote passed its version of H.R. 4213, which previously cleared the House.

ARRA's language--and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' proposed meaningful use rule--exclude hospital-based physicians from receiving incentive payments. But many industry stakeholders believed that congressional intent was to include physicians who primarily work in ambulatory care facilities owned by hospitals.

ARRA excluded "hospital-based eligible professionals" from receiving meaningful use incentive payments. The law defined these professionals as "an eligible professional, such as a pathologist, anesthesiologist, or emergency physician, who furnishes substantially all of such services in a hospital setting (whether inpatient or outpatient) and through the use of the facilities and equipment, including qualified electronic health records, of the hospital."

An amendment in the Senate-passed bill would remove "setting (whether inpatient or outpatient)" from the definition, and insert "inpatient or emergency room setting." Consequently, physicians furnishing substantially all services in an inpatient or emergency room setting would be excluded, but those in ambulatory facilities owned by the hospital would be eligible for incentive payments. Here's the language:

SEC. 219. EHR CLARIFICATION.

    (a) Qualification for Clinic-Based Physicians.--

    (1) MEDICARE.--Section 1848(o)(1)(C)(ii) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w-4(o)(1)(C)(ii)) is amended by striking ``setting (whether inpatient or outpatient)'' and inserting ``inpatient or emergency room setting''.

    (2) MEDICAID.--Section 1903(t)(3)(D) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(t)(3)(D)) is amended by striking ``setting (whether inpatient or outpatient)'' and inserting ``inpatient or emergency room setting''.

    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by subsection (a) shall be effective as if included in the enactment of the HITECH Act (included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Public Law 111-5)).

    (c) Implementation.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Secretary may implement the amendments made by this section by program instruction or otherwise.

Full text of H.R. 4213 as passed by the Senate soon will be available at congress.gov. The bill now returns to the House for consideration of Senate changes.

--Joseph Goedert

EHR

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

A major success factor for accountable care organizations will be linking caregivers across the spectrum of care delivery. If history is any indication, that's going to be an industrywide struggle.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.