SEP 15, 2008 11:06am ET

Related Links

Verizon, Health Evolution Partners Align to Accelerate Health I.T.
February 6, 2012
Vendors Team for Mock HIPAA Privacy Audits
February 1, 2012
Laptop Loaded with PHI Stolen from Lexington Clinic
January 31, 2012
Bi-Partisan Report Seeks Effective Federal HIT Spending
January 27, 2012
HHS Seeks Mobile Computing Security Best Practices
January 25, 2012
Social Security Numbers, Other Veterans’ PHI Ends Up on Ancestry.com
January 23, 2012
OSU Offers Credit Protection Following Data Breach
January 10, 2012

Web Seminars

Tomorrow’s Practice Management with Centricity Practice Solution
Available On Demand
It's Final: What You Need to Know About the ACO Rule
Available On Demand
Are you Ready for ICD-10? Southwest General Leverages Analytics to Reduce Translation Risk
Available On Demand

Stark Readies I.T. Legislation

Print
Reprints
Email

Rep. Pete Stark (D-Calif.) expects soon to introduce new health information technology legislation in the U.S. House.

The bill would build on the proposed PRO(TECH)T Act, H.R. 6357, from the Energy and Commerce Committee and already under House consideration.

Stark is chair of the Ways and Means health subcommittee. The new legislation would retain about 70% of H.R. 6357, according to a summary of a Sept. 12 meeting between members of the HIMSS Electronic Health Records Vendors Association and Ways and Means staff. Provisions in a draft of the bill include:

* Preserving the grant and loan programs authorized in H.R. 6357.

* Directing federal officials to coordinate development of an open source electronic health record. The system could be based on the Veterans' Administration's VISTA system or developed from scratch. The system would be made available to providers at a nominal cost.

* Creating Medicare incentive payments to providers who purchase and use I.T. systems. Ways and Means staff estimates the incentives could total $4 billion. Five years after the incentive program starts, providers who have not adopted I.T. would be penalized.

* Requiring federal officials to examine the definition of "health care operations" to determine which activities can be conducted with de-identified data and which need patient consent.

* Maintaining most of H.R. 6357's provisions on privacy and security, but specifying that the accounting requirement would apply only to disclosure of information stored in an electronic health records system.

* Increasing penalties for violations of the HIPAA privacy rule and requiring a Government Accountability Office study on the "minimum necessary" standard for disclosing information.

* Authorizing state attorneys general to file lawsuits to enforce the privacy rule.

Discussions between the Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce Committees are under way over whether health I.T. legislation could reach the House floor during the rest of the congressional session this year, according to the summary.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

A major success factor for accountable care organizations will be linking caregivers across the spectrum of care delivery. If history is any indication, that's going to be an industrywide struggle.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.