DEC 4, 2012 12:11pm ET

Related Links

Using Analytics to Support an ‘Ambulatory ICU’ Model
May 23, 2013
University Settles with Feds After HIPAA Violations
May 22, 2013
Consumer Groups, EHR Vendors Talk Back to GOP Senators
May 21, 2013
Data Entry Error Leads to Data Breach at LSU
May 21, 2013
Medical Loss Ratio Rules Finalized for Medicare Advantage & Drug Programs
May 20, 2013
Rule Sets Pre-existing Coverage Rates
May 20, 2013
Quick Turnaround on Breach Notification
May 17, 2013

Insurers to Pay Fees in States Rejecting New Health Market

Print
Reprints
Email

Health insurers who want to sell plans in states that refuse to create new U.S. health-care marketplaces will have to pay fees for the federal government to regulate them.

Insurers will pay a fee of 3.5 percent of their premiums to sell plans in a federally run health exchange, the government said Nov. 30 in a regulatory filing. The exchanges are new marketplaces somewhat like online travel services where uninsured people will buy policies.

Each state must tell the federal government by Dec. 14 whether they will run an exchange. So far, 17 have said they won’t build one, according to the nonprofit Kaiser Family Foundation of Menlo Park, California. In another six, the government will build the exchange and run it in partnership with the state. The total amount of the fee announced today won’t be known until all states have made their decisions, the government said.

The proposed regulation also describes how the government will prevent insurers from cherry-picking healthy customers in the exchanges. The rule “will help to ensure that every American has access to high-quality, affordable health insurance,” the Department of Health and Human Services said in the filing.

Republican refusals

Most states that have refused to build exchanges have Republican governors, who have said they oppose the health-care law, projected to extend coverage to about 30 million Americans who would otherwise lack it. Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, a Republican, said Nov. 28 that she wouldn’t build one because her state “would wield little actual authority” over an exchange and it would cost $27 million to $40 million a year.

Insurers say that the fees will be passed onto their customers. “Any new fees to pay for the administration of exchanges will add to the cost of coverage, and that is why the focus needs to be on reducing administrative costs, streamlining operations, and avoiding regulatory duplication that will add complexity and increase costs,” Robert Zirkelbach, a spokesman for America’s Health Insurance Plans, the industry’s Washington lobbying group, said in an e-mail.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

As the feds ramp up enforcement of privacy and security rules, providers look to fill protection gaps.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.