FEB 7, 2013 12:22pm ET

Related Links

New WEDI Program Facilitates State ICD-10 Cooperation
May 22, 2013
First Vendors Get Accredited for Direct Messaging Services
May 22, 2013
Consumer Groups, EHR Vendors Talk Back to GOP Senators
May 21, 2013
Coalition to Senate: Time to ‘Re-do’ Meaningful Use
May 20, 2013
AHA to Senators: EHR Concerns Understandable, but Don’t Pause Meaningful Use
May 20, 2013
Rule Sets Pre-existing Coverage Rates
May 20, 2013
Medical Loss Ratio Rules Finalized for Medicare Advantage & Drug Programs
May 20, 2013

HIMSS: Limit EHR Certifiers’ Role in HIT Safety Plan as Others More Appropriate

Print
Reprints
Email

The Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society supports much of the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology’s proposed HIT safety plan, but in a comment letter offers additional ideas to enhance or clarify some of the provisions.

For instance, the organization is concerned that a provision to have ONC-Authorized Certification Bodies incorporate I.T. safety in post-market surveillance of certified electronic health records technology is too broad and the ACBs lack core competencies on safety.

HIMSS further asserts that ONC already expects to leverage patient safety organizations’ common reporting system, and a common format that the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality has developed. “We note that an ACB appendage for reporting may create an unnecessary level of complexity due to the potential for generating unfiltered reports in the absence of an analytic or response mechanism that fits into the overall reporting system.”

Unlike some commenters, HIMSS does not take a stand on the issue of creating a national patient identification system, but notes that it has asked Congress to direct a study of the issues and best approaches to identify an appropriate national patient data matching strategy.

HIMSS also calls a proposed requirement for a safety risk assessment as part of meaningful use a premature step in lieu of standards, and it may be burdensome to providers. The complete comment letter is available here.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

As the feds ramp up enforcement of privacy and security rules, providers look to fill protection gaps.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.