NOV 7, 2012 5:13pm ET

Related Links

California Developing Guidance for Patient Consent of HIE
May 17, 2013
OCR Seminars to Walk through Omnibus HIPAA Rule
May 16, 2013
AMA Report: EHRs in Exam Rooms Need Not be Disruptive
May 15, 2013
Web Seminar to Focus on Using Direct Messaging in Stage 2
May 15, 2013
McKesson Software Giveaway for Charity Care Expands
May 14, 2013
Do You Know a ‘Health I.T. Young Blood’ ? – Contest Underway
May 14, 2013
Nurse Carts Becoming More Sophisticated in Capabilities and Use
May 13, 2013

Safety Advocates Seek National Safety Goals for EHRs

NOV 7, 2012 5:13pm ET
Print
Reprints
Email

Two professors who have long argued for increased safety of electronic health records systems are at it again, calling for “electronic” patient safety goals modeled after the Joint Commission’s National Patient Safety Goals.

“EHR implementation is still highly heterogeneous across health care systems and providers, and this heterogeneity leads to equally variable implications for patient safety,” write Dean Sittig, Ph.D, and Hardeep Singh, M.D., in the current New England Journal of Medicine. “For instance, the priorities for patient safety in an organization in the midst of an EHR rollout differ from those of an organization that has used a fully integrated EHR system for 5 or more years.”

Sittig is a professor at the University of Texas School of Biomedical Informatics, and Singh serves as an assistant professor at the VA Health Services Research and Development Center of Excellence and at Baylor College of Medicine in Houston.

To account for variables in organizational EHR experiences, they propose a three-phrase plan for developing EHR-specific patient safety goals, called e-PSGs. The first phase addresses safety concerns unique to EHR technology with a goal of reducing downtime and safety issues, such as miscommunication between components of the same EHR system (ordering sustained release medication in CPOE but erroneously mapped as immediate release medication in the pharmacy module).

The second phase would address mitigation of safety concerns from failing to appropriately use EHRs. “For instance, if CPOE is used to order medications but not laboratory tests, there would be no way of ensuring closed-loop electronic communication of test results to the ordering providers, potentially leading to more missed results,” the authors say. Consequently, one goal of the second phase could be to mandate CPOE for all medication, lab and radiology orders.

The third phase would use EHRs to monitor health care processes and outcomes, and identify potential safety issues before they cause harm. “To achieve the goals of many national initiatives to improve patient safety and to facilitate the prevention of safety events, electronic data must be used to help detect, manage and learn from potential safety events in near real-time,” according to the report, “Electronic Health Records and National Patient Safety Goals,” available here.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.