NOV 9, 2012 4:57pm ET

Related Links

California Developing Guidance for Patient Consent of HIE
May 17, 2013
OCR Seminars to Walk through Omnibus HIPAA Rule
May 16, 2013
AMA Report: EHRs in Exam Rooms Need Not be Disruptive
May 15, 2013
Web Seminar to Focus on Using Direct Messaging in Stage 2
May 15, 2013
McKesson Software Giveaway for Charity Care Expands
May 14, 2013
Do You Know a ‘Health I.T. Young Blood’ ? – Contest Underway
May 14, 2013
Nurse Carts Becoming More Sophisticated in Capabilities and Use
May 13, 2013

Federal Advisors Seek Comment on Stage 3 Meaningful Use Criteria

NOV 9, 2012 4:57pm ET
Print
Reprints
Email

The federal advisory HIT Policy Committee has developed preliminary recommendations for Stage 3 criteria under the electronic health records meaningful use incentive program, and has released its 44-page document for public comment.

"The Stage 3 vision includes a collaborative model of care with shared responsibility and accountability, building upon the previous MU objectives,” the committee explains. “While the committee appreciates and recognizes today’s challenges in setting up data exchanges, it is the committee’s recommendation that Stage 3 is the time to begin to transition from a setting-specific focus to a collaborative, patient- and family-centric approach.”

Translation: Get ready by 2016 for substantially enhanced requirements to exchange data among all stakeholders with a focus on team-based models of care that support population management and outcomes.

Stage 3 criteria that currently are under consideration include:

* Require eligible professionals to conduct secure messaging with 10 percent of patients, but assess the readiness to raise it to 30 percent based on Stage 2 experiences.

* Require EPs to make information available to patients within 24 hours if generated during the course of a visit, and within four business days for labs and other information not generated during the visit, with the potential to raise both thresholds based on Stage 2 experiences.

* A menu measure would require EPs and hospitals to provide 10 percent of patients with the ability to submit patient-generated information. An example could be medical device data collected at home if appropriate standards are ready.

* Hospitals within two hours of a significant health event would notify at least one key member of the patient’s care team, such as the primary or referring physician.

* EHRs must be able to query another entity, such as an EHR or health information exchange, for outside records, and respond to such queries from other entities.

* EHRs should be able to accept two-factor (or higher) authentication for providers to remotely access protected health information. The committee also seeks comments on logical next steps for increasing privacy and security requirements.

The HIT Policy Committee’s request for comments is available here. The comment period will be open for 45 days following publication in the Federal Register in coming days.

Comments (4)
If Stage 3 requirements do not include 100% of patients, how helpful will this actually be for the physician and patient. A patient who wants access to their records, but was not selected by the physician to be placed in the EHR system or a patient who does not have the means or interest in accessing their records and was selected by the physician for EHR both create waste and frustration from the patient and physician. Hopefully a commonsense method of coordinating patient interest in EHR will drive the selection of patients by the physician.

A citizen interested is avoiding wasteful spending and maintaining low cost access to health services Michael B. Thompson Glen Allen, VA

Posted by Michael T | Saturday, November 10 2012 at 8:55AM ET
Let's just get MU2 correct first as we know it is poorly designed altough intensions are good. The govt. needs to set up a database for everybody to export and import to. Storage is cheap!!!! Then they can figure out how to use the data and leave us docs to do MEDICINE. The data will allow all parties to work in the same system. Interfaces to the data would make all EHRs compatible and save money due to HIE addition programing, for MU to infinity can be done though the data not the doc office, and any other things the idiots can think of. Make it simple for ALL! Get it right before expanding the system that is now a burden.
Posted by Michael A | Sunday, November 11 2012 at 8:32AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.