OCT 4, 2012 4:16pm ET

Related Links

HIT Vendor Round-up: Prognosis, HealthInfoNet, PracticeMax & McKesson
May 23, 2013
Using Analytics to Support an ‘Ambulatory ICU’ Model
May 23, 2013
Feds: 2013 Goal for Meaningful Use Participation Already Met
May 22, 2013
First Vendors Get Accredited for Direct Messaging Services
May 22, 2013
New WEDI Program Facilitates State ICD-10 Cooperation
May 22, 2013
Consumer Groups, EHR Vendors Talk Back to GOP Senators
May 21, 2013
Healthland Acquisition Targets the Continuum of Care
May 21, 2013

AHRQ Wants to Rate the Educational Effectiveness of EHRs

Print
Reprints
Email

The HHS Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality is in the early stages of developing a “health information rating system” to assess how well electronic health records systems support educating patients.

“In order to fulfill the promise of EHRs for all patients, especially for persons with limited health literacy, clinicians should have a method to determine how easy health education material is for patients to understand and act on, have access to a library of easy-to-understand and actionable materials, understand the relevant capabilities and features of EHRs to provide effective patient education, and be made aware of these resources and information,” according to a notice and request for public comment available here and being published Oct. 5 in the Federal Register.

Consequently, AHRQ’s program will involve developing a rating system, creating a library of patient education materials, reviewing EHR education capabilities and functions, and educating EHR vendors and users. The Oct. 5 notice pertains to the first step: a draft health information rating system that AHRQ has developed.

“The draft HIRS was used by AHRQ researchers to rate two sets of patient health education materials: a set of six education materials related to asthma and a set of six education materials related to colonoscopy. Each of these 12 health education materials received a score for their understandability and actionability. Some of the materials received good scores on the draft HIRS, meaning that the researchers considered them to be understandable or actionable, and some materials received poor scores on the draft HIRS, indicating that the materials had low understandability or low actionability.”

Now, AHRQ intends to have consumers review and score these education materials--identified in the notice by name, publisher and how researchers rated them--to assess their understanding of the materials and what actions to take.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

As the feds ramp up enforcement of privacy and security rules, providers look to fill protection gaps.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.