NOV 1, 2012 12:11pm ET

Related Links

CMS Data: 95% of Medicare RAC ‘Corrections’ Are Overpayments
May 24, 2013
New Interoperability Training Tools Focus on Stage 2 Criteria
May 24, 2013
Intermountain Tracking Patients’ Cumulative Radiation Exposure
May 24, 2013
Using Analytics to Support an ‘Ambulatory ICU’ Model
May 23, 2013
The Task for PAC/RIS Leaders: Learn Analytics
May 23, 2013
Separating Translation Research from Innovation
May 23, 2013
Got an Idea? Learn How to Commercialize It
May 23, 2013

AHA Sues HHS, Says Medicare is Refusing to Pay for Necessary Care

Print
Reprints
Email

The American Hospital Association and four delivery systems have sued the Department of Health and Human Services, alleging the Medicare program is refusing to pay for hospital care provided to patients “even though all agree that the care provided was reasonable and medically necessary as the Medicare Act requires,” according to the lawsuit.

“The government’s refusal to pay for this care is harming hospitals and patients,” the suit contends. “More pertinent here, it violates the Medicare Act and is otherwise unlawful.”

Along with AHA, other plaintiffs include Lancaster (Pa.) General Hospital, Missouri Baptist Sullivan Hospital in Sullivan, Munson Medical Center in Traverse City, Mich., and Trinity Health Corp. in Livonia, Mich. The suit was filed Nov. 1 in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

The hospitals contend that HHS is refusing to reimburse hospitals when in hindsight it determines the care could have been provided in an outpatient facility or department rather than the inpatient part of the hospital. The hospitals argue that physicians are the ones who decide whether to admit a patient to the hospital, and complications such as age and chronic conditions play a factor in the decision.

“When Recovery Audit Contractors decide that care could have been provided in an outpatient facility or department instead of an inpatient setting, hospitals must return the funding they received years earlier,” according to an AHA statement. “They then get little or often no reimbursement for the ‘outpatient’ services they provided even though there is no dispute whatsoever that the care received was reasonable and necessary. The only dispute is whether it could have been delivered in an outpatient department instead of the hospital.”

Plaintiffs are asking for the nonpayment policy to be overruled and that hospitals be reimbursed for denied payments in the past. HHS has not yet responded to the the lawsuit, available here.

Comments (3)
So RACs to the rescue! Hindsight is a wonderful thing. So the laywers now can fight it out so more money wasted. Laywers also would have benefited if outpt. was done and in hindsight AGAIN procedure should have been inpt. Why not just precert? And hold doctors harmless if wrong decision made? Let the paperpushers and lawyers fight it out. Let us take care of the pts.
Posted by Michael A | Thursday, November 01 2012 at 7:41PM ET
This is all nice that the big players are arguing the perceived or real injustice. However hospitals could not exist without physicians. When a recovery audit occurs and the hospital payment is returned to Medicare it automatically means that related medical services for same hospital pay will be also recovered from physicians. They are the ones who actually treat and direct the treatment of the patients. Why are the hospitals not including their physicians in the dispute. They are only interested in their own reimbursement. Now here is the news: if the physicians will not get paid they may just decide not to work for the hospitals.

Good luck Gentleman the future of deficit is upon us.

Leslie Huszar MD Neurologist Vero Beach FL

Posted by Leslie H | Friday, November 02 2012 at 12:17AM ET
Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

As the feds ramp up enforcement of privacy and security rules, providers look to fill protection gaps.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.