APR 30, 2009 4:38pm ET

Related Links

Deadline Extended for I.T. Young Bloods Contest
May 22, 2012
Investor Sues Allscripts to Stop Revamped Board
May 22, 2012
HIT Vendor Round-up: ICA, Eldorado, InterSystems & Medsphere
May 21, 2012
AHRQ Seeks Improvements to I.T. Workflow Toolkit
May 21, 2012
Big Jump in E-Prescribing in 2011
May 18, 2012
Analytics Guru Thomas Davenport to Keynote at HDM Conference
May 18, 2012
Utah I.T. Director Resigns Following Breach
May 17, 2012

“Meaningful Use” Focus Proposed

Print
Reprints
Email

The initial federal definition of “meaningful use” of electronic health records should focus on improving medication management and the coordination of care. That’s the recommendation of a new report endorsed by representatives of more than 60 organizations.

In the weeks ahead, the Department of Health and Human Services will offer guidelines for how hospitals and group practices can demonstrate “meaningful use” of EHRs to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid financial incentives under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

The report, from the Markle Foundation, a New York-based think tank, offers a simple proposed meaningful use definition for 2011-2012, when incentives begin: “Demonstrates that the provider makes use of, and the patient has access to, clinically relevant electronic information about the patient to improve medication management and coordination of care.”

The report notes: “The meaningful use definition must optimize achievability for providers and benefits to patients and consumers. Improving medication management and coordination of care provides early opportunities for such optimization. Meaningful use should initially rely on standard information types, such as recent medications and laboratory results, that are electronic and already widely adopted and that can support metrics to improve medication management and coordination of care.”

The report urges the federal government to outline specific ways to measure progress toward the goals of improving health care quality, reducing growth in costs, stimulating innovation and protecting privacy. “If the goals and metrics are not clear before technology is commissioned and the incentives are offered, the government will risk wasting valuable resources and losing support from both health care providers and the public for further I.T. investments.”

Regarding privacy and security, the report calls for requirements to be “sequenced strategically so that they can be implemented in a timely way without creating unrealistic software upgrade and process burdens on clinicians and hospitals.”

Endorsers of the report represent technology vendors, health care providers, payers and professional associations, among others. The Markle Foundation’s Connect for Health initiative prepared the report. The initiative focuses on promoting the use of health care I.T. while safeguarding privacy.

To view the full report, click here

--Howard Anderson

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

Looking to build better care coordination, health systems are buying physician groups in droves. Making the deal work, however, requires careful management on the I.T. front.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.