JAN 9, 2006 5:51pm ET

Related Links

Federal Grants Help HIEs Link Mental Health and Medical Providers
February 10, 2012
API Augments its Scheduling Portfolio with Concerro Buy
February 9, 2012
New Content on HHS Consumer Web Sites
February 8, 2012
Study: E-Scripts Improve Medication Adherence
February 1, 2012
Aetna Wants Dentists to Push Smoking Cessation via iPads
January 31, 2012
HIT Vendor Round-up: Castlight, MedAssets & Aprima
January 31, 2012
HIT Vendor Round-up: New Client Wins
January 30, 2012

Web Seminars

Harnessing Business Intelligence to Innovate Emergency Departments
Available On Demand
Enhancing Hospital Quality Improvement with Retrospective Outcomes Analysis and Real-time Clinical Surveillance
Available On Demand
Positive Patient ID: Bar Coding Success at the Bedside
Available On Demand

Study: Web Speeds Error Reporting

Print
Reprints
Email

A study of 26 hospitals conducted by Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, found that 92,547 medical errors or adverse events took place at the organizations between Jan. 1, 2001 and Sept. 30, 2003. The study was posted online on Jan. 9 by the Journal of General Internal Medicine. The study was conducted in part to determine the potential of Web-based software to improve error reporting.

Tufts-New England researchers analyzed self-reported data from hospitals that used an online electronic error reporting system from Doctor Quality Inc., Philadelphia, for at least three months. Of the total number of medical errors reported, 32% caused temporary harm to patients. Less than 1% caused life-threatening harm or death.

Further, 34% were nonmedication related clinical events; 33% were medication related events; 13% were falls; 13% were administrative and 6% were labeled as "other." Nurses reported 47% of the events while physicians reported 1.4%.

While not commenting on the volume of errors, researchers said Web-based software enables error data to be collected four times faster than by other methods, which in turn enables facilities to more easily identify and analyze practice patterns that lead to errors. They also say that such systems enable near misses to be routinely recorded and all data to be peer-reviewed and protected on hospital networks.

The study was partially funded by grants from the Ruth Kirschstein Individual National Research Service Award and the Agency for Health Research and Quality. Participating hospitals ranged from 120 to 582 beds.

For more information, go to tufts-nemc.org.

Comments (0)

Be the first to comment on this post using the section below.

Add Your Comments:
You must be registered to post a comment.
Not Registered?
You must be registered to post a comment. Click here to register.
Already registered? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.
Twitter
Facebook
LinkedIn

A major success factor for accountable care organizations will be linking caregivers across the spectrum of care delivery. If history is any indication, that's going to be an industrywide struggle.

Login  |  My Account  |  White Papers  |  Web Seminars  |  Events |  Newsletters |  eBooks
FOLLOW US
Already a subscriber? Log in here
Please note you must now log in with your email address and password.