FREE Health Data Management Site Registration

Sign up today and access the leading source of Health Care I.T. information on the Web.

Your FREE site registration entitles you to:

Free Health Data Management e-newsletter
 
Search more than 12,000 articles
 
Access Web Seminars on a host of I.T. topics
 
White Papers and Industry Research that provide valuable insights on a variety of technologies and implementation issues
 
Podcasts, updates on industry events, and much more!

 
   

PHRs: Where Are We Headed?


By Howard J. Anderson, Executive Editor April 30, 2008

Personal health records are in the spotlight at center stage now that two technology giants—Microsoft and Google—have both launched high-profile projects to support PHRs. The debate on what long-term role — if any — PHRs will play in improving the quality of health care while cutting costs is intensifying.

Some observers suggest all the hype about PHRs is extremely premature, given that the vast majority of doctors’ offices don’t yet have their own patients’ records automated. PHR proponents, however, say consumers are demanding better access to data, and even a partial PHR is better than nothing.

Privacy advocates are declaring “not so fast” as they point out that Microsoft, Google and a growing list of other technology vendors are not “covered entities” under HIPAA and thus cannot be held accountable for complying with this federal law’s data privacy and security rules. They are cautioning consumers to take an extremely close look before they leap into PHRs from these vendors.

A broad array of players, even including some technology vendors, are advocating expansion of HIPAA or passage of new federal regulations to ensure that PHRs are secure and the data they contain remains private.

Meanwhile, the end point—the “ultimate PHR,” if you will—is far from clear. Many observers have concluded that we’ll likely wind up with several PHR models from which consumers can pick and choose.

For now, some PHR projects are leveraging communitywide health information exchanges or a health record bank (see sidebar). Others are tethered to data from a single integrated delivery system. And some are initiated by employers (see sidebar, below).

“If we’re really consumer-oriented, we have to acknowledge that it’s up to the individual how to frame a PHR to meet their needs by offering a variety of options,” says Linda Kloss, CEO at the American Health Information Management Association, Chicago. The trade group has created a Web site, myphr.com, that educates consumers on their options.

For now, it’s difficult to assess whether PHRs ultimately will prove to be a passing fad or a ubiquitous technology.

A Definition?

Representatives from every health care sector continue to debate how a PHR should be defined. But there’s a growing consensus that, ideally, personal health records should somehow gather data from multiple sources, including, for example, the electronic health records of physicians and hospitals, the medication records of pharmacies, the test results from labs, the claims data from payers, and the patient’s own notes, such as information about their blood sugar levels or weight changes.

Realizing this ideal, interoperable, all-encompassing vision of a PHR will be a huge challenge. For now, most PHRs remain in the very earliest stages, with hundreds of models for how they should be assembled.

Google, Microsoft and a few other technology firms envision providing a national platform that consumers can use to store PHR data, often also using technologies from PHR vendors.

Meanwhile, some consumers are simply filling out electronic forms on their own and carrying them around on USB flash drives or storing them on their computers at home.

And some enterprising physicians are helping their patients select a PHR option that best fits their needs.

More Special Report Articles

Consumer Health Archive
Electronic Health Records Archive
Hospitals Archive
Group Practices Archive

Marketplace