FREE Health Data Management Site Registration

Sign up today and access the leading source of Health Care I.T. information on the Web.

Your FREE site registration entitles you to:

Free Health Data Management e-newsletter
 
Search more than 12,000 articles
 
Access Web Seminars on a host of I.T. topics
 
White Papers and Industry Research that provide valuable insights on a variety of technologies and implementation issues
 
Podcasts, updates on industry events, and much more!

 
   

New Standardization Effort Targets Test Results



As communities implement regional health information organizations, they need to make sure that all physicians have access to standard laboratory and diagnostic imaging results. That's because a lack of uniform data could cause serious problems. For example, decision support systems might not send doctors alerts about abnormal test results if the results are sent in multiple formats.

To ensure emerging regional health information organizations provide access to uniform data, three hospitals and multiple physician practices in two Massachusetts communities are working to standardize, or normalize, laboratory and diagnostic imaging values.

Standard Taxonomy

The hospitals and practices use different electronic health records systems. Further, hospitals and standalone labs and imaging centers use proprietary terminologies to document lab results, diagnostic imaging observations and many other clinical observations. One lab system, for instance, might code a potassium test as "WR12839" while another system codes it as 'K."

The provider organizations are part of an effort to build RHIOs in three Massachusetts communities, with physician use of electronic health records fueled by a $50 million commitment from Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts.

If successful, the standards could be adopted by other organizations in Massachusetts as part of an initiative to create a state health information exchange. And the standard values could be a model for the nation, contends Sumit Nagpal, CEO of Wellogic Inc., a Cambridge, Mass.-based vendor building the platform for the Massachusetts RHIOs. The firm is mapping the disparate lab values and imaging observations into normalized terms.

The towns building RHIOs and wiring physicians to EHRs are Brockton, with two hospitals, and Newburyport and North Adams with one hospital each.

In North Adams, across the state from the other communities, physicians agreed to adopt EHRs from a single vendor, so they are not participating in the effort to normalize terminologies. But physicians in Brockton and Newburyport use EHRs from six companies, which prompted the normalization effort.

After six months of work by a team of 20 clinicians and information technology professionals, Wellogic has cross-mapped almost 18,000 lab values or clinical observation codes to 4,000 uniform values and codes for lab and diagnostic imaging results, Nagpal says.

Now, hospitals in Brockton and Newburyport will test the uniform, or normalized, codes with community physicians. The tests will start with four practices using EHRs from the same vendor and then expand to practices using disparate EHRs.

Hospitals will continue to use their proprietary terminologies to report lab values and diagnostic imaging observations. But they will send the results to the RHIO platform from Wellogic, where they will be mapped to normalized terminologies for physicians.

Consequently, physicians will receive the same terminology for the lab or imaging results regardless of where exams were taken. That means potassium levels, or values, for a patient will be standardized for physicians-and placed in their EHR-regardless of where the test was conducted. This will enable easy comparison and trending of test results, Nagpal says.

"They can be viewed longitudinally on flow sheets and graphs rather than individually on separate lab reports."

Having normalized values will improve the efficiency and quality of care, says Kevin Lamphear, M.D., president of Newburyport Family Practice, which will be a pilot site.

That's because one lab may call a particular test a "Chem 7," a second may call it a "Chem Profile" and a third may call it a "Smack 7," he explains.

"If we can have standardized reporting, then it will be much easier to translate that information into useful data for the patient," he adds. "It will be easier to see at a glance what values are out of range."

Because most patients in a community use the same lab, specialists who treat patients from multiple towns will see the biggest advantage of normalized values if the practice eventually becomes commonplace, Lamphear adds.

The real value of normalized data, however, may be in populating electronic health records systems to drive decision support, says Micky Tripathi, president and CEO of the Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative, which is working to establish EHRs across the state.

More Hospitals Articles

Health Information Exchange Archive
Hospitals Archive

Marketplace